What is history?
Perhaps a diary should be the thing to write down what happened in that day. But I think it also could be the place to state your opinions, feelings or thoughts about something. So, today I'm going to write a book report.
The name of the book is ‘What is history?’ based on a speech made by E.H.Carr in 1961 in Cambridge University. The most famous part of this book is "History is a continuous process of interaction between the historian and his facts, an unending dialogue between the past and the present." Maybe you would wonder at the word "his facts" because the history is often tought as an objective thing with no doubt. If the that 'common sense' was right, "his history" must have been changed to "the history". But the thought of 'an objective history' is wrong, because it's inevitable that every history is affected by the interpretation of the historian as long as the historian chooses the import fact from every fact which occureed in the past. However, the atitude we should take toward this truth is not neglect nor pessimism. We need to identify the accuracy of the fact that is choosen by the historian and the objectivity between the fact and his interpretation. If this procedure is taken correctly, then you have to generalize his fact to get some lessens which would contribute to the future in a certain way. This is the benefit of study of the history and why we need to learn it.
The interpretation of a certain fact is various, but the fact itself is only one. A few years ago Japan and China argued the problem in the history such as Yasukuni Shrine problem. The difference between their opinion is lied on their interpretation of the fact. We quarreled because we looked at a mountain from different points. As long as we looked at a same mountain, we can end up in gettting the same picture of the mountain. In order to achieve the purpose, both people need to understand from where the opponent is looking at the mountain through dogged dialogue.
The name of the book is ‘What is history?’ based on a speech made by E.H.Carr in 1961 in Cambridge University. The most famous part of this book is "History is a continuous process of interaction between the historian and his facts, an unending dialogue between the past and the present." Maybe you would wonder at the word "his facts" because the history is often tought as an objective thing with no doubt. If the that 'common sense' was right, "his history" must have been changed to "the history". But the thought of 'an objective history' is wrong, because it's inevitable that every history is affected by the interpretation of the historian as long as the historian chooses the import fact from every fact which occureed in the past. However, the atitude we should take toward this truth is not neglect nor pessimism. We need to identify the accuracy of the fact that is choosen by the historian and the objectivity between the fact and his interpretation. If this procedure is taken correctly, then you have to generalize his fact to get some lessens which would contribute to the future in a certain way. This is the benefit of study of the history and why we need to learn it.
The interpretation of a certain fact is various, but the fact itself is only one. A few years ago Japan and China argued the problem in the history such as Yasukuni Shrine problem. The difference between their opinion is lied on their interpretation of the fact. We quarreled because we looked at a mountain from different points. As long as we looked at a same mountain, we can end up in gettting the same picture of the mountain. In order to achieve the purpose, both people need to understand from where the opponent is looking at the mountain through dogged dialogue.
